Comparison

AWS Lambda vs Cloudflare Workers

Both run code without servers, but Lambda is functions in AWS regions, while Workers are lightweight V8 isolates at the edge of Cloudflare's network.

AspectAWS LambdaCloudflare Workers
Execution modelFunctions in microVMs (Firecracker) in an AWS regionV8 isolates in hundreds of cities worldwide
Languages and runtimesNode.js, Python, Java, .NET, Go, Ruby and custom container imagesJavaScript, TypeScript, WebAssembly; Python in beta
Cold startFrom tens of milliseconds to seconds depending on runtime and sizePractically none, isolates start in milliseconds
Run timeUp to 15 minutes per invocationCPU time limits, long tasks need Durable Objects, Queues or Workflows
EcosystemIntegrates with all of AWS: S3, DynamoDB, SQS, API GatewayKV, R2, D1, Durable Objects, Queues on Cloudflare's own platform
Node.js compatibilityFull Node.js runtimeA subset of APIs, many packages work through a compatibility mode
PricingBy invocations and execution time with memoryBy requests and CPU time, usually cheaper for light workloads
Best forBackend logic inside AWS, event processing, heavy computeEdge APIs, redirects, A/B tests, personalization, light services

Choose AWS Lambda when

  • Your data and services are already in AWS.
  • You need other languages, longer tasks or large dependencies.
  • Event processing from S3, SQS, DynamoDB Streams.

Choose Cloudflare Workers when

  • You need minimal latency for users in different regions.
  • The logic is light: routing, checks, APIs.
  • You want simple deployment with no region choice.

Bottom line

Lambda is better as part of the AWS ecosystem and for heavier logic. Workers win on start speed, global proximity and simplicity for light APIs. They complement each other well.

Compared

Logos belong to their owners and are used for identification only. Icons: Simple Icons (CC0), Devicon (MIT).